Molecular structures guide the engineering of chromatin
Tekel SJ and Haynes KA (2017) Nucleic Acids Res. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx531
Specialized proteins within the nuclei of human and other eukaryotic cells wrap DNA into a structure called chromatin. For decades, scientists have used biochemistry, genetics, and comparative evolutionary biology to understand the specific interactions and processes that guide the highly-regulated packaging of DNA into chromatin, as well as chromatin features that act to switch gene expression on and off. Basic research has enabled chromatin engineering by rational design for building new tools to further understand chromatin, and for applications such as molecular interventions of cellular disease states. This review highlights key discoveries in chromatin research and engineering efforts that have been supported by this knowledge.
Eukaryotae Synthetica: Synthetic Biology in Yeast, Microalgae, and Mammalian Cells
Schofield D, Templar A, Borg Y, Daer R, Haynes K, Nesbeth D. (2016) Synthetic Biology Handbook. 145-182
A new educational resource for the growing field of synthetic biology, the “Synthetic Biology Handbook,” has just been released. The chapter on mammalian synthetic biology was co-authored by Dr. Karmella Haynes, SBHSE PhD student Rene Daer, lead editor Darren Nesbeth, and co-authors Desmond Schofield, Alexander Templar, and Yanika Borg.
Synthetic biology: Building genetic containment
Haynes KA (2016) Nat Chem Biol. 12:55-56.
Dr. Karmella Haynes’ News & Views article discussing Chan et al.’s recent work on genetic containment of genetically modified organisms has been published in Nature Chemical Biology, part of the Nature Publishing Group. Read the rest of this entry »
Editorial – Frontiers in Bioengineering – Synthetic Biology: Engineering Complexity and Refactoring Cell Capabilities
Synthetic Biology: Engineering Complexity and Refactoring Cell Capabilities
Ceroni F, Carbonell P, François J-M and Haynes KA (2015) Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 3:120. PMID: 26347864
This editorial was written for a special topic issue in the journal Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. Featured articles included the latest progress in synthetic biology with. Research papers focused on rational design within the context of a complex, natural cell or system. In spite of (or because of) biological complexity, bioengineering has produced some concrete biotechnological applications. The cover art was created by Dr. Karmella Haynes.
Review – Frontiers in Bioengineering – Can the natural diversity of quorum-sensing advance synthetic biology?
Can the natural diversity of quorum-sensing advance synthetic biology?
Davis RM, Muller RY and Haynes KA (2015) Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 3:30. PMID: 25806368.
Quorum sensing takes place when small molecules generated by one bacterium diffuse over to a neighbor and control that neighbor’s genes. With 100 morphologically and genetically distinct species of eubacteria that use quorum sensing to control gene expression, why does the bioengineering community only use about 4 variants to control cell communication? This review explains quorum sensing systems, their use in engineering, the problem of crosstalk between parallel QS systems, and how natural QS diversity might be used to address this problem.
- Corrigendum: Can the natural diversity of quorum-sensing advance synthetic biology? Important corrections to Figure 5, which shows conservation and variation of secondary structure motifs in quorum sensing regulator homologues.
Preparing synthetic biology for the world
Moe-Behrens GHG, Davis R, Haynes KA (2013) Front. Microbio. 4: 1-10. PMID: 23355834
Synthetic biology aims to develop self-replicating systems that are durable enough to operate reliably in complex environments such as the human gut, polluted soil, and other areas in which disease or toxins need to be remediated. Although helpful, this robustness in “open environments” (outside of the research lab) has raised concerns about lack of control of genetically engineered cells. In this review we discuss early development and advances (from the 1980’s to the present) in built-in, genetically encoded safety switches.
I’m heading back to ASU from a very mind-expanding week of leadership training, a very generous investment in the future of synthetic biology hosted by the Sloan Foundation, NSF, SynBERC, The BioBricks Foundation, and the Woodrow Wilson Center. Twenty emerging leaders of synthetic biology were invited to propose and develop strategic action plans  to advance synthetic biology in the public interest. The speakers were amazing and inspiring. I feel both fired up and focused.
This blog post marks the beginning of my synthetic biology community project, a parts registry that captures the community’s activities related to every biological part that lives in the database. I plan to draw framework structures from the big biology databases, dynamic crowd-sourced editing sites, and even social networking sites. The project will start as a series of micro-experiments where I ask the community to report their experience with a biological part or a protocol.
The repository I envision has no official name yet. But as I typed the title of this post, Biological Parts Repository or “BPR”; seemed to have potential…beeper? The acronym is short, and can be pronounced as a word that ends in a sound that makes it work as a verb (I beepered the promoter we ran those measurements on). #GuyKawasaki
- Haynes KA. Incentive-driven information sharing for engineering biology. http://synbioleap.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/incentive-driven-information-sharing-for-engineering-biology.pdf